Why the yacht industry is trying to quit teak — and what could replace it

/ General / By

Why the yacht industry is trying to quit teak — and what could replace it

Teak has been the marine world’s luxury default for decades: honey-brown planks on sun decks, cockpit soles, swim platforms, and the kind of interior trim that signals “superyacht” before you read the name on the stern. It’s not just fashion. Teak earned its reputation the hard way: it stays grippy when wet, resists rot and saltwater, tolerates sun and spray, and—thanks to its natural oils—can survive outdoors with minimal coatings.

But the same qualities that make teak desirable also make it a supply-chain headache. The highest-grade, old-growth teak associated with elite yacht decks has historically come from Myanmar’s natural forests. That market now sits under heavy restrictions and sanctions in the UK, EU, and US, and regulators have been explicit that “paperwork” is not enough when a product’s chain of custody can be laundered. The result is a slow-motion material transition: yacht builders are testing, adopting, and sometimes fully switching to alternatives that can deliver teak-like performance without teak’s legal, ethical, and ecological baggage.

This isn’t a simple swap. A yacht deck is a hostile operating environment: UV, salt, heat cycling, mechanical abrasion, and constant human contact (barefoot comfort matters). Any substitute must work with marine adhesives and caulks, must not become dangerously hot in sun, must drain well, and ideally must be serviceable for decades.

So what happens if the industry really does move beyond teak? The answer is not one miracle material—it’s a portfolio of approaches.

Why teak became the gold standard on boats

Teak (Tectona grandis) is a tropical hardwood prized for durability and water resistance, with natural oils that help it withstand moisture, fungus, and pests. For boatbuilding, that translates into a deck surface that can be left unfinished (to weather to a silver-grey), lightly oiled, or varnished for a glossy look—depending on the owner’s taste and tolerance for maintenance.

Decking also benefits from teak’s “real-world ergonomics.” Properly laid teak provides traction, feels pleasant underfoot, and can be repaired in sections. Even its downsides—high cost, finite thickness, a tendency to grey—became part of the aesthetic language of yachting.

In short: teak isn’t popular because it’s fashionable; it’s fashionable because it works.

The problem: the ‘best’ teak is tied to high-risk supply chains

The yacht industry’s teak problem is not that teak is impossible to grow elsewhere. It’s that the most coveted teak has historically come from old-growth forests, especially Myanmar, which accounts for a large share of naturally occurring teak. Old-growth material tends to come in wide, long boards and has a look that buyers associate with “the real thing.”

But Myanmar’s timber sector has long been entangled with governance and legality questions. After Myanmar’s 2021 coup, sanctions targeted military-linked parts of the economy, and teak became an obvious pressure point. Even before that, regulators had tightened rules intended to stop illegally harvested timber from entering major markets.

For yacht builders and suppliers, the practical consequence is brutal: even if you believe you are buying “legal” teak via intermediaries, proving that claim to the satisfaction of regulators can be extremely difficult.

The BBC recently highlighted how Myanmar teak can continue to appear in supply chains—sometimes passed off as plantation teak from other countries—while stockpiles of pre-sanctions old-growth timber get exhausted. In other words, the market dynamic pushes buyers toward either lower-grade plantation teak or alternatives.

Regulation is changing the risk calculation (and real fines make it concrete)

“Due diligence” is no longer a box-ticking exercise when the material is high risk.

In the UK, Sunseeker International was fined after an investigation found breaches of timber laws, including failures of due diligence and recordkeeping relating to imports that included teak from Myanmar. That case matters not only because of the size and profile of the company, but because it underlines the point regulators want the industry to internalize: if a supply chain is widely associated with illegal logging and laundering, you need exceptional controls—or you should choose a different material.

The EU’s timber rules (historically the EU Timber Regulation) likewise push responsibility onto “operators” who place timber on the market: if you can’t show that the wood is legally harvested, you’re exposed.

This legal climate turns teak from “expensive but straightforward” into “expensive and potentially radioactive.” Even a well-intentioned shipyard does not want to gamble a nine-figure project’s delivery schedule on whether a timber dossier holds up.

Why plantation teak often disappoints the superyacht market

A common question is: why not just use plantation teak?

Plantations can be managed sustainably, and some operators seek certifications. But the high-end yacht market tends to be picky about:

  • Board dimensions: younger trees yield smaller, narrower boards.
  • Color and grain: buyers expect a specific dark-brown look and uniformity.
  • Waste rates: if a large percentage of boards are “not good enough,” costs rise.

That doesn’t mean plantation teak is “bad.” It can perform well. But perception matters in luxury markets, and deck aesthetics are a visible status signal. Yacht clients often start by demanding teak because that’s what they’ve seen on brochures and marinas; convincing them otherwise requires a compelling alternative that looks and feels right.

The emerging alternatives: four big buckets

The modern “anti-teak” toolkit is best understood as four categories:

  1. Modified natural woods (thermally modified, chemically modified, resin-impregnated)
  2. Engineered wood products (laminated teak / composites that use more of each log)
  3. Synthetic decking (PVC-based and other polymers designed to mimic teak)
  4. Non-wood natural options (notably cork)

Each category solves a different part of the problem.

1) Thermally modified and resin-treated woods: making other species behave like teak

Thermal modification changes wood by heating it (typically in controlled oxygen-limited environments). The goal is to reduce moisture uptake, increase dimensional stability, and improve durability—essentially “teaching” another species to survive outdoors.

Yacht builder Sunreef Yachts has publicly described a move away from teak decking, offering thermally modified woods that are designed to resemble teak visually. A key claim from proponents is that some modified woods can improve comfort: better thermal performance (cooler under intense sun) and better insulation for spaces below deck.

A specific example highlighted by the BBC is TESUMO, developed through a research project involving Lürssen shipyard and the University of Göttingen. TESUMO’s own materials describe a three-stage modification process applied to fast-growing wood, intended to deliver dimensional stability, weather resistance, and durability comparable to teak, while sourcing from “politically harmless” regions.

What to watch with modified woods:

  • Track record: marine decks are a decades-long test. “Looks great after one season” isn’t enough.
  • Repairability: can a yard replace sections seamlessly, or does the product have color drift?
  • Surface checking and cracking: modification can reduce or change how wood checks.
  • Adhesive/caulk compatibility: the deck is a system, not just a plank.

Modified woods are promising because they preserve a core selling point of teak: “it’s still wood.” For owners who want authenticity underfoot, this may be the easiest psychological transition.

2) Engineered teak laminates: using more of each tree (and faking the ‘wide board’ look)

If the industry is reluctant to abandon teak aesthetics, engineered teak offers a compromise.

The concept is straightforward: take plantation-grown teak that might not meet premium decking standards, slice it into thin layers, and laminate it to create a stable, strong product. The laminated structure can “trick the eye” into seeing a higher-grade board while using more of the harvested log.

This approach attacks two problems at once:

  • Resource efficiency: less waste per tree.
  • Supply consistency: engineered products can be manufactured to consistent dimensions.

Engineered teak does not eliminate all ethical questions—teak is still teak—but it can reduce pressure on old-growth forests and make plantation supply more viable for premium uses.

3) Synthetic teak: plastics that are getting less awful

Synthetic decking has existed for years, and early versions earned a mixed reputation: too hot in sun, too “plastic” in texture, hard to repair invisibly, and sometimes environmentally dubious.

But the category is evolving. Flexiteek, one of the best-known brands, positions its latest product generation as easier to clean (often just water), lighter than some alternatives, and closer to teak in temperature performance. Flexiteek also emphasizes the idea of “bio-attributed” or non-fossil fuel PVC in its manufacturing story.

The appeal of synthetic options is obvious for owners and fleet operators:

  • Low maintenance: no sanding, less scrubbing, fewer specialty cleaners.
  • Color stability: teak greys; synthetics can be formulated not to.
  • Supply stability: you aren’t dependent on tropical forestry cycles.

The trade-offs are equally real:

  • Heat management: a deck that becomes too hot is a safety issue.
  • Microplastics and end-of-life: sanding and wear can shed material; recycling options vary.
  • Aesthetics: for some buyers, synthetic is still “not the real thing.”

The more plausible future for synthetic teak is not that it perfectly replaces teak everywhere, but that it becomes the default in segments where low maintenance and consistent appearance matter more than material purity.

4) Cork: sustainable, comfortable, and… polarizing

Cork shows up in the teak-alternative conversation because it is harvested from bark that regrows rather than by felling trees. That can give it a compelling sustainability story and a potentially lower carbon footprint.

Functionally, cork can be comfortable underfoot and may have decent thermal behavior in sun. But it challenges yacht culture: it looks different. Some owners love the distinctive appearance; others see it as incompatible with the traditional “teak deck” visual language.

Cork’s niche may be similar to linoleum in architecture: technically sound, increasingly fashionable in certain circles, but still a deliberate aesthetic choice.

The hidden technical requirements: a yacht deck is more than a surface

When people talk about “teak vs. alternatives,” they often focus on looks. Builders care about systems engineering:

  • Thermal expansion: different materials move differently with temperature.
  • Water behavior: drainage, swelling, and how seams perform over time.
  • Fastening vs. bonding: modern decks may be glued systems; adhesives must match.
  • Weight: material choices affect stability, speed, and fuel use.
  • Maintenance ecology: cleaning chemicals, sanding, and runoff into marinas.

This is why the transition is gradual. A shipyard can’t bet its reputation on a deck material that fails in five years on a flagship build.

The culture shift problem: buyers ask for teak by default

One of the most important points in the BBC reporting is cultural: many customers start by demanding teak until someone explains why teak is complicated—and shows that alternatives can be visually indistinguishable at a glance.

Luxury markets are narrative-driven. “This is a better deck” is less persuasive than “this deck performs as well as teak, avoids sanctions risk, and reduces pressure on threatened forests.”

The real leverage is not just technical performance. It’s reputational risk. Yacht owners increasingly care about optics: the wrong materials story can follow a high-profile build for years.

What a post-teak future could look like

If teak truly becomes “rare, regulated, and controversial,” yacht decking will likely fragment by use case:

  • Superyachts and custom builds: higher adoption of modified woods and engineered teak that preserve the wood feel.
  • Production yachts and charter fleets: growing use of synthetic decking for predictable maintenance.
  • Eco-forward builders: experiments with cork and other low-carbon materials.

Meanwhile, teak won’t disappear overnight. Some builders will still source from longstanding plantations (for example in Indonesia/Java or India), and some owners will continue to prefer the traditional look and aging behavior of real teak.

But the direction of travel is clear: teak is no longer the “default choice with no questions asked.” Every teak deck now comes with a story—about legality, provenance, and sustainability—and not every buyer wants to inherit that story.

Bottom line

Teak earned its reputation as a near-perfect marine decking material, but the yacht industry is now paying the price for relying on a supply chain that’s difficult to verify and often linked—directly or indirectly—to high-risk logging and sanctions-sensitive markets.

The replacement won’t be a single substitute. The realistic future is a mix of:

  • modified woods that behave like teak,
  • engineered teak products that reduce waste and smooth supply,
  • synthetic materials that improve every generation,
  • and niche natural options like cork.

In other words: the yacht industry isn’t just shopping for a new wood. It’s redesigning the definition of “premium” in a world where provenance matters as much as polish.

Sources

n English